Saturday, September 29, 2012

Local governments see 6.2 pct rise in property tax receipts

Sept 25 (Reuters) - Property tax collections by U.S. cities, towns and other local governments jumped 6.2 percent to $91.1 billion during April, May and June from 2011's second quarter, the U.S. Census Bureau said on Tuesday in a report reflecting a steadying housing market.
When property taxes paid to state governments are included, total property tax revenues that are especially important to local governments totaled $94.4 billion in the three months ended June 30, or 5.7 percent more than a year earlier.
Those gains offset declines in collections of sales taxes and corporate income taxes, the bureau said, and helped lift overall state and local tax collections in the quarter by 3.3 percent in what was the eleventh consecutive quarter of increases.
"Tax revenue for the quarter totaled $360.9 billion, as compared with $349.9 billion reported for the second quarter of 2011," the Census Bureau said referring to the total tax for states, cities and local governments.
U.S. local governments get 29 percent of their revenues from taxes paid on real estate.
Property tax revenues declined 2.5 percent in 2010 from 2009 and fell another 3.6 percent in 2011, even as many state governments battled budget deficits by reducing payments to local governments, according to a report in June by the Pew Center on the States.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Property Taxes Jump for Local Governments, Census Reports

U.S. local governments’ property- tax collections increased 6.2 percent during the second quarter from the year before, the Census Bureau reported, easing the strain on cities from the housing market crash.
The increase to $91.1 billion during the three months ending in June marks a shift from the year before, when collections dropped for the period. Including states, property taxes rose 5.7 percent to $94.4 billion.
The rise indicates cities may be recovering from the worst of the financial setbacks triggered by the slide in real-estate prices, which forced them to dismiss workers and cut their budgets to make up for the lost revenue. Such spending cuts have been a drag on the nation’s recovery from the recession that ended more than three years ago.
The Census report was released amid signs that low mortgage rates are boosting the real estate market. In July, property values in 20 cities rose 1.2 percent from a year earlier, the biggest twelve-month advance since August 2010, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller index, released today.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Bi-national airport terminal hostage to propety tax brawl

Imagine if someone were to move into your house without paying rent, consequently making your food, water and electric bills more expensive. Adding insult to injury, the freeloader turns out to be a multi-millionaire who argues he does not have to pay rent because your parents own the house.
As absurd as it sounds, a similar situation is threatening to derail an airport terminal and border crossing project linking Otay Mesa with Tijuana International Airport. Unlike American airports, which are managed and operated by local governments, the majority of Mexican airports are managed by private corporations.
One of the project’s primary investors, Mexican airport management company Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico currently operates Tijuana International Airport without paying property taxes to Tijuana’s municipal government. Tijuana Mayor Carlos Bustamante has taken a stand against this injustice by stalling the project’s approval until GAP agrees to pay property taxes.
GAP argues it shouldn’t have to pay property taxes because the airport is on federal land. This argument reveals a flaw with Mexico’s government: its structure is too centralized, which hurts local governments. Because local governments in Mexico must get approval from their state legislatures to issue their own taxes, many have to rely heavily on the federal government to provide them revenue. This makes it nearly impossible for local governments to generate revenue or benefit from major projects, such as the Otay Mesa terminal. Tijuana is trying to resolve the issue in Mexican courts, but a favorable ruling is unlikely given the rampant corruption in Mexico’s judicial system.
Bustamante isn’t against the project. He knows it would boost the local economy by increasing international commerce. What he is against, however, is a giant corporation making fat profits by freeloading on the local government. Bustamante wants Tijuana to get its fair share of the deal by ensuring filthy rich investors on both sides of the border will make massive profits. He’s taking a stand for the right of local governments to collect their own taxes and generate their own independent revenue stream. It’s the same as asking your neighbor for a share of the profits from the lemonade stand he wants to set up on your property.
GAP should not be complaining about having to pay property taxes to the Tijuana municipal government. The corporation has a total revenue of $304.1 million and oversees almost every major airport on Mexico’s West Coast. It can easily afford to pay property taxes and shouldn’t be freeloading when its airport lies inside Tijuana’s municipal boundaries. If GAP wants to be an ally of Tijuana, it should pay its fair share of taxes to the city, considering it operates the airport serving it. GAP’s business partner, Equity Group Investments, will have to pay business and property taxes to San Diego City and County, respectively, but the company isn’t moaning about it.
It would be a disgrace for a project benefiting both sides of the border to be derailed by GAP’s corporate greed. This project would ease overcrowding at Lindbergh Field and make border crossings easier by decreasing wait time of three hours to cross at San Ysidro. GAP would be one of the primary beneficiaries with an estimated 1.1 million new customers coming to its airport. The profit from all these new customers will outweigh any property tax GAP would have to pay to Tijuana.
We need a new airport terminal and easier access to the border, and all the partners involved should be able to benefit financially from the project.
This should include businesses, customers and local governments. It will improve relations on both sides of the border where cooperation is needed. Paying your fair share to your local government is a responsibility for both individual citizens and private businesses.

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Not happy with your property taxes?


Why unfunded mandates from Hartford are causing our property taxes to rise

In case you missed it, the cover story in Barron’s on August 25th ranked Connecticut as the worst-managed state in the nation in terms of its outstanding debt and unfunded pension liability relative to its GDP.

Needless to say, ranking as the worst state in the union in national publications is not going to attract or retain a lot of businesses, jobs or residents. The underlying huge problems with taxes, debt and unfunded liabilities must be addressed before they provoke a crisis that will severely limit our options. And if these highly visible state-level problems are not enough to make you wonder about how long you and your family should stay in Connecticut and about the future value of any property you own here, there is another big problem that hits us even closer to home — Hartford continues to pile more and more unfunded mandates on towns like Fairfield, driving our local property taxes higher and higher.

An unfunded mandate is a state law that requires a town to pay for something that it was not previously doing or to pay more for the services it wants to provide, in response to which it has only two options: either raise property taxes or cut other services, like patrolling neighborhoods, plowing roads or responding quickly to 911 calls.

According to the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, a state-wide, bipartisan association of towns and cities, there are currently over 1,200 unfunded or partially funded mandates; information on all of them is available on its Web site.

Some of the most egregious examples of forcing Fairfield to pay more than it would otherwise have to pay are the following:

• “Prevailing Wage Rate” is a law that requires towns to pay inflated wages on construction projects over $400,000 for new work and over $100,000 for renovation projects even if there are reputable contractors who are willing to do the work for substantially less.

• “Minimum Budget Requirement” is a law, believe it or not, that says education budgets cannot be reduced even if enrollment declines, even if efficiencies are found, even if savings are achieved, even if there was a surplus the year before. Towns should make that decision, not Hartford.

• “Compulsory Binding Arbitration” is a law that requires Fairfield to accept the judgment of an arbitration panel when the town and its public employees can’t agree on the terms of a new contract, even though the members of that panel are not accountable to our tax payers; a town’s legislative body can reject an initial arbitration award, by a two-thirds vote, but then the award of the second arbitration panel is final and binding.

• “In-School Suspension” is a new law that requires Fairfield to find suitable space and to pay the substantial cost of hiring paraprofessionals or teachers to provide all-day supervision for any student who is suspended unless it is too dangerous to do so. Previously, a suspended students’ parent(s) or guardian(s) were responsible for supervision.

Ultimately, the problem with unfunded mandates is one of Transparency and Accountability.

In its ceaseless, relentless creation of more and more programs year after year, the state Assembly should not be allowed to shift the economic burden of what it is doing onto Connecticut’s towns. If Hartford wants to create a new program or expand an existing one, then it should figure out how to pay for it with state revenues. Not doing so denies voters the transparency they need to evaluate whether their state representatives are serving them well, and to hold them accountable.

What can and should be done?

As a candidate for the State Assembly in District 133, I believe we can solve this problem. If elected, I will advocate for the following:

1. Review and eliminate or reform all existing unfunded state mandates;

2. Ensure that estimates of any unfunded-mandates costs are accurate;

3. Require a two-thirds majority in the Assembly to enact any material new unfunded mandate;

4. Reform “Binding Arbitration” to give towns the right to reject any and all arbitration awards by a two-thirds vote of their legislative bodies;

5. Eliminate “Prevailing Wage Rate” restrictions on municipal projects

6. Reform the “Minimum Budget Requirement” to allow towns like Fairfield to decide on whether or not education spending should decline for reasons such as lower enrollment or efficiencies.

Any reform efforts will be much more productive if a majority of Connecticut voters decide on Nov. 6 that one-party rule for 36 of the past 40 years has not served our towns and state well.

Friday, September 21, 2012

NJ town told to cut property taxes

Gov. Chris Christie's administration has told a New Jersey town to cut its property taxes by $500,000.
Christie tells radio station New Jersey 101.5 FM he asked his Community Affairs Department to investigate after callers to the station's recent "Ask The Governor" program complained about their taxes in Monroe Township.
Christie says the township had exceeded his 2 percent property tax cap by $530,000.
The average taxpayer's bill will be reduced by an estimated $25.
The Star-Ledger of Newark reports township business administrator Wayne Hamilton issued a statement acknowledging the mistake and willingness to correct it.
The average property tax bill in the Middlesex County town was $6,259.81 last year, up 1.4 percent from 2010.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Indianapolis coffee company plans to open facility in Lafayette



Indianapolis-based Copper Moon World Coffee is poised to begin roasting coffee in Lafayette if it receives property tax abatements in Tippecanoe County.

“We’re a wholesale coffee roaster,” said Cary Gutwein, president of Copper Moon World Coffee. “By and large ... we roast and pack in our brand, and we sell regionally and nationally.”

Copper Moon World Coffee plans to buy a 35,059-square-foot manufacturing facility at 1759 S. Veterans Memorial Parkway East. The site is the former Brenneco service facility, east of the Journal & Courier’s printing facility and southeast of IU Health Arnett Hospital, said Jody Hamilton, economic developer for Greater Lafayette Commerce.

The Indianapolis-based coffee roaster is about halfway through the process to secure tax abatements on its real estate and its equipment, which Gutwein said is needed before closing on the property and formally announcing intentions for the Lafayette operations.

The company started more than 25 years ago in Kentucky and moved to Indianapolis in 2005, Gutwein said Tuesday.

The Tippecanoe County Council approved the acres around the former Brenneco facility an economic revitalization area at its meeting last week. This move also OK’d the first hearing of the tax abatements, council President Roland Winger said. The final reading on the abatements will come at the council’s Oct. 9 meeting. The commissioners also must give their approval at their Oct. 1 meeting.

Tax abatements phase in the taxes assessed on property and equipment over the term of the abatement. For example, a company with a 10-year abatement would pay nothing the first year on the assessed value of the abated property or equipment. In subsequent years, one-tenth of the property or equipment taxes are added until the business is paying the full tax by the last year of the agreement.

If approved, a 10-year abatement would be applied to up to $500,000 of assessed value in real estate improvements to the building, Hamilton said. The council also will consider a seven-year abatement on $800,000 of assessed value on new equipment.

All totaled, both abatements would save Copper Moon World Coffee about $60,000 in its tax obligations, Hamilton said.

Gutwein, who is from the Lafayette area, is related to county Councilman Andy Gutwein, who recused himself from the discussions and the voting to avoid a conflict of interest, Hamilton said.

The county must approve the abatements because the facility currently is outside of Lafayette city limits, but the area is expected to be annexed into the city by the time the abatements take effect.

“This tax abatement is unique,” Hamilton said. “The building is actually in the county. ... Come January ... that building will come into the city.”

“It puts a vacant building back into use,” Lafayette Economic Development Director Dennis Carson said.

Copper Moon World Coffee would bring 19 jobs in the first two years, he said, which means more revenue for governments and a healthier local economy.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Housing development slowdown leaves suburbs to pay for new infrastructure


  When Howell Township borrowed money for water and sewer lines several years ago, the economy was booming, houses couldn't be built fast enough and the township had every reason to expect its investment would be paid back with additional property taxes and utility fees.
Then the economy collapsed, and the rest is well-documented history: The developers never built the houses and there was no additional revenue.
Similar stories are playing out in many other southeastern Michigan communities that went through the building boom and bust. Many communities put in roads, sewers or water lines during the housing boom as a way to attract development.
Today, those infrastructure loans still have to be paid and, in some cases, cash-strapped communities are passing those costs back to taxpayers.
Howell Township is asking voters in November for a 3.5-mill property tax to repay the water and sewer loans. It's the township's second attempt at the millage; voters turned it down by a margin of more than 4-to-1 in August. It would cost an additional $350 a year for a home worth $200,000.
William Ketchum lives on Henderson Road, where sewer lines were installed several years ago.
"The entire area just went nuts for a while," Ketchum said of the building boom. "It seemed unrealistic that it would continue, but everybody kept jumping in. You had to believe there was an end in sight, but no one knew where that was."
Ketchum said he's more fortunate than some of his neighbors, because he's far enough off the road that the township is not forcing him to pay for sewers he doesn't use.
"There's a whole lot of people who aren't happy," Ketchum said. "It isn't just the millage; it's also the fact that they're going to be forced to hook up."
Neighbor Lucille Morrison pays $50 every three months for a sewer system that's not even hooked up to her home, which has its own septic system.
"It doesn't matter whether you use it or not, you pay," Morrison said. "I don't like it. I'm on a fixed income."
Paying the price
Homeowners in Washtenaw County's Sylvan Township are faced with a 4.4-mill property tax to help pay off a $13-million loan for water and sewers for two developments: a 350-unit condominium community, of which only about 50 were built, and 350 houses, none of which were built.
The millage, which passed by seven votes in the August primary election, adds $440 to the yearly property tax bill for a homeowner with a $200,000 house.
Years ago, the developers used a lawsuit to force the township to put in the water and sewer infrastructure, said Supervisor Robert Lange. The township tried to hook up to another community's sewers, but the developers wanted a dedicated system, he said.
Then the developments went bust, and the township was stuck with the bill. "There's no way we could pay for these bonds" without the millage, Lange said.
What does he think of the situation? "I don't think you can print it," Lange said.
Not only do many communities owe for bonds they took out to finance water lines, sewers or roads, they also may owe their county money if a developer didn't pay property taxes.
Many cities and townships dipped into their county's delinquent tax revolving loan fund to keep the cash flow going as developments were going bust, Oakland County Treasurer Andy Meisner explained. Their plan was to repay the loans once the county collected the taxes or the properties went through tax foreclosure and were sold at a county auction.
The problem was, in many instances, the properties didn't sell at auction, and the taxes went unpaid. The properties then reverted back to the city or township, which now has to repay the county loan fund.
Such is the case in Sylvan Township, which is faced with repaying both the infrastructure bonds and the county's revolving tax fund.
Relief in sight?
Some communities have been cutting expenses and services to keep paying for their unused infrastructure debt.
"They put in infrastructure; it was backed by bonds, and that money went south," Tyrone Township Clerk Keith Kremer said of his Livingston County community's $18-million sewer system.
The township had 10 housing starts this year, a hopeful sign because that's more than in previous years. But at that rate, it will take a long time to build out all its sewer capacity.
Officials have cut expenses -- and employees -- so the township, south of Fenton, could keep paying its loans. The township will probably end up loaning its sewer fund $4 million-$6 million from its general fund, Kremer said.
Other communities are hoping the housing market turns around in time.
Hartland Township borrowed $27 million for sewers that were never fully used. About $2 million worth of those properties are now owned by the township because the taxes weren't paid.
"We know we have enough cash right now to make the bond payments for the next five years," said township Manager James Wickman.
It can also sell some of the property it has acquired through tax foreclosures to raise money.
"We're seeing (housing) sale prices increasing, and they have been for a little while now," Wickman said. "There are positive moves in the market. Nothing dramatic, nothing to make you think the heyday is back, but it's a step in the right direction."
Lyon Township officials said they are on their way to a rebounding real estate market in the southwestern Oakland County community, with 200 housing permits last year, the most since 1998, said Supervisor Lannie Young.
The rebound comes just in time. The township borrowed $21 million for sewers during the housing boom, most of which went unused in the housing crisis, Young said, adding that taxpayers are unlikely to approve a tax increase to make the loan payments.
"It's not the general public's problem," Young said. "But by now, we're pretty well tapped." Young has also been contacting other developers about buying undeveloped property.
"It's been a juggling act for two or three years," Young said. "I think one more year, and we're out of a mess that looked pretty bleak a couple of years ago."
Macomb Township was another community where many houses were built during the building boom. After the bust, there were three subdivisions where infrastructure was built and never used.
But in that case, the township required developers to pay for the infrastructure, said Supervisor Mark Grabow. Consequently, the taxpayers weren't left to pay the bill, Grabow said.
Lessons learned
After being burned by the housing collapse, communities may become less willing to front the money for water, sewers and roads for proposed developments.
"That may be one of the takeaways, one of the teachable moments," Meisner said. "This is an unintended consequence that is a very real, very long-lasting and very expensive consequence."
Now, Meisner has advice for local governments: "Let's be real careful when we approve these. It can become a long-term liability for the local government."
More Details: Why development forecast changed
In 2008, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments predicted the exurbs — the outer-ring suburbs of metro Detroit — would be filling up with houses and development by 2035.
The subsequent stock market and housing crashes, however, changed that picture so dramatically that when SEMCOG released its latest forecast in March, out to 2040, the agency predicted that exurban growth would not materialize after all.
Instead, SEMCOG predicted that housing foreclosures, coupled with a forecast of fewer jobs and, consequently, fewer people in southeast Michigan, would erase the demand for more houses in the outer suburbs of Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, Washtenaw, St. Clair and Monroe counties.
SEMCOG releases a new forecast about every five years. The agency said its previous forecasts have been accurate within 1%-1.5%.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Advocates Urge Protection From Tax Liens on Small Debts

When a little old lady is thrown out of her home two weeks before Christmas because she didn’t pay a $496 sewage bill, people take notice.
At least the Rhode Island General Assembly did, and five years later, the state says more than 2,500 homeowners are still in their homes largely because of the Madeline Walker Act. That 2006 law is named after the 81-year-old woman who was evicted and saw her home of 40 years sold at tax sale for $836 and then resold for $85,000.
“The economy is really, really difficult. People are struggling every day, trying to decide: Do I pay the mortgage? Do I buy food? Do I pay my real estate taxes?” says Leslie McKnight, director of loan servicing for Rhode Island Housing, the state housing agency responsible for enforcing the law.
Some consumer advocates point to the Rhode Island law as a model for other states for its consumer safeguards, including more notices to the homeowner before a tax lien sale can be held.
The term “property tax lien” can be confusing, in large part, because state laws vary widely on a process that allows local governments to sell the property to private purchasers or investors if the owner falls behind on paying property taxes.
As Madeline Walker’s case shows, a tax lien sale may be started over an unpaid water or tax bill of only a few hundred dollars and then sold at a tax lien sale for the back taxes owed on the property. (A settlement was reached with the new owner that allowed the property to return to Walker.)
Most owners have a right to get back their property, but they also have to pay the interest, which can be as high as 24 percent in Iowa and reach as high as 50 percent in Texas, according to a recent report from the National Consumer Law Center, an advocacy group based in Boston.
John Rao, author of the report, says that, while he realizes state and local governments need the tax revenue, outdated state laws are fueling “a second nationwide foreclosure crisis.”
Tax lien sales total some $15 billion across the country, he says, and that figure is expected to climb because of a weak job market, depressed home values, and an increase in mortgage foreclosures. Florida alone had nearly $2 billion in back tax liens and sold $1.8 billion of these liens in 2009, the group said in a report that includes a summary of state tax sale laws.
Advocates in Kentucky are pushing for legislative changes. “The main problem we have is that the tax liens are sold to third-party purchasers, resulting in higher costs and fees and sometimes resulting in foreclosures,” says Anne Marie Regan, a senior staff attorney with the Kentucky Equal Justice Center, an advocacy and research group. The group wants local jurisdictions to collect liens instead of selling them and would like to see more tax lien clinics to help homeowners understand their rights.

Some of those protections are in Rhode Island’s law. The Madeline Walker Act requires cities, towns, and other taxing authorities to notify Rhode Island Housing of delinquent liens before the tax sales can take place. The agency is giving the first option to purchase residential tax delinquencies at the time that they may go for sale.
Of the 2,530 tax liens that the Rhode Island Housing has acquired, the state says 63 percent (1,603) of the liens the state purchased have been “redeemed” or bought back by the homeowners after the state worked with the homeowners to get their payments back on track. The state has reached out to more than 23,000 homeowners since the law was enacted, providing advice, financial assistance and education to keep them in their homes.
Many of the homeowners getting help are unemployed, underemployed or elderly people who are struggling financially, and those with “underwater mortgages” that leave owners with more debt on the property than the current market value of the house.
Indiana is another state that requires detailed notification to homeowners, according to the NCLC report. Pennsylvania’s warning notices must be in 10-point type and clearly state that the property is about to be sold without the owner’s consent for delinquent taxes, and that the property may be sold for a fraction of its fair market value. In Michigan, the county treasurer sends the initial notice of the tax foreclosure court action by certified mail.
The National Tax Lien Association, an industry group, has defended the process. “It is a financial service that benefits local governments with the funds needed to operate, the investors with a reasonable interest rate on annual returns, and often times benefits the delinquent taxpayers with a decreased interest rate than if the tax lien was never sold,” Brad Westover, the group’s executive director, told the Wall Street Journal.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Anti-Tax Organizations




No Home Tax- Stop Taxing Our Property

S.T.O.P: Stop Taxing Our Properties (Pennsylvania)

Americans For Tax Reform

National Taxpayers United of Illinois

Tax Day Tea Party

People For The American Way

Description: Extax_Logo
Meeting Today’s Property Tax Challenges

Friday, September 14, 2012

New Jersey County Boards of Taxation



Most of New Jersey’s twenty-one counties have websites for their County Board of Taxation with a wealth of information for property owners and taxpayers.  While the information provided was accurate at the time of publication, no representations are made for the content of any of the external links provided.